Overheard conversation in the cockpit that you might not want to have heard

Date:June 27, 2007 / year-entry #233
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20070627-01/?p=26233
Comments:    24
Summary:A few weeks ago, I got a piece of email from a friend. Maintenance crew in cockpit. They just told the pilot that the airplane "double faulted."

A few weeks ago, I got a piece of email from a friend.

Maintenance crew in cockpit. They just told the pilot that the airplane "double faulted."


Comments (24)
  1. James Schend says:

    Maybe the plane was just playing tennis and lost the serve… maybe…

  2. no one says:

    Maybe a "Faulted" is something the pilots were drinking, and they had a double….Or perhaps you misheard the maintenance guy and he offered the pilots a "double malted"…

  3. That reminds me of a far-side joke. Pilot in cockpit says to co-pilot:

    "Oh no! The fuel light is on! We’re going to crash and we’re all going to die!!!!

    Whoops.. That’s just the intercom light."

  4. SvenGroot says:

    I’m only really worried when the conversation involves the on-board computer repeatedly telling the pilot "sink rate, pull up." :P

  5. Jamie says:

    Pilot: "Did the airplane compete in the gymnastics competition?"

    Crew: "The airplane double vaulted."

    or

    Pilot: "Is the ceiling flat?"

    Crew: "Nah, the airplane is double vaulted."

  6. Grant says:

    I was once on a flight out of Calgary. As we were backing out from the gate the plane stopped suddenly. After a few minutes we were pushed back into the gate and a tech in greasy overalls boards the plane and starts talking to the flight crew. The captain explained that one of their computers had crashed. The tech indicates that they should just reboot it and not worry about it. And off we went. Makes me think twice about upgrading to first class. I’d rather not have seen that.

    On a related note…. this was the time I accidentally left my tools in my carry on bag. When I went though the x-ray machines, they guy  motioned me over and told me I shouldn’t be carrying screwdrivers, wire cutters, etc. on board. I explained the mix up and they let me board. Ahh, the days before 9-11 were so innocent.

    Also… don’t watch a Mayday marathon before flying.

  7. miles archer says:

    On Jetblue they have live TV. I was watching 50 worst airline disasters while flying to Boston. great fun.

  8. aaron says:

    pilot to maint crew: "But we’re triple redundant, right?"

    "Ok, it’s all good."

  9. tcliu says:

    (In case someone reads this who doesn’t know what a double fault is.)

    Double fault: Exception occurring when recovering from another exception. (Triple fault is exception when trying to handle a double fault.)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_fault

  10. bramster says:

    In 1999, in kinder, gentler days, I was in the cockpit of an Airbus A340 on a flight from Toronto to Vancouver (the pilot wanted to see my   Garmin 195 Aviation GPS).

    I asked if were true that the Airbus fly-by-wire system would sometimes do the equivalent of Control-Alt-Delete.

    The answer was "all the time", i.e, not infrequently.

    Perhaps that’s where the "double-faulted" comes from.

  11. Timothy Knox says:

    Many years ago, I was flying into Chicago’s O’Hare airport on United, which offered the ability to listen in on the Air Traffic Control chatter. I remember hearing something like the following:

    ATC: United 1131 [my flight], descend to 2500 feet and report the runway.

    Silence from the plane.

    ATC: United 1131, repeat, descend to 2500 feet and report the runway.

    United 1131: Descending to 2500 feet, still looking for the runway.

  12. Brian says:

    You’d be surprised at how low planes can get in IFR (bad weather) without being able to see the runway.  At some airports, it’s literally a couple hundred feet above the ground.

  13. John C. says:

    Though "still looking for the runway" may sound disturbing, not being able to see the runway at 2500 feet altitude (assuming a roughly sea-level runway) is actually not at all remarkable. Vanilla Category 1 ILS (instrument landing system) approaches can have a decision height (DH) of 200 feet AGL (above ground level) assuming surrounding terrain and obstructions permit. I’ve flown plenty of approaches around Seattle with ~300-foot DHs in instrument training as a private pilot.

    Anecdotally, it’s a truly amazing experience to go from being entirely surrounded by clouds and having no visibility whatsoever to suddenly dropping out of the bottom of the layer a few feet above your DH or MDA (minimum descent altitude, the rough equivalent for so-called non-precision approaches) to see the runway stretching out right in front of you.

    Looking at it another way, if a plane is descending 1,000 feet per minute, 2,500 feet means you’re 2.5 minutes from the runway, which is a relatively long time.

    And incidentally, Category IIIc ILS approaches (which require specific equipment on the aircraft and ground as well as specific crew training) actually have a zero DH. In other words, the pilots can land the plane — or more precisely, let the plane autoland itself — with zero visibility. (I’m playing a little fast and loose with the definition of "visbility"; technically instrument approaches have both a DH or MDA and a forward visibility requirement.)

    Strangely, private pilots operating under Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulations can actually take off IFR in zero/zero visibility, not that I can imagine why anyone sane would do that.

  14. Worf says:

    Depends on the ILS in use. Most common will have a minimum decision altitude of 200 feet (the altitude at which you may not descent below unless you have the runway visually).

    The most sophisticated ILS systems let you do a landing in zero visibility. But they require at least three autopilots to be functional and agreeing on the results (basically, the autopilots are doing the landing). Any disagreements and it’s instant overshoot procedure.

    Anyhow, x86 lore – wasn’t it a trick to use the triple-fault to exit from protected mode back into real mode? (I can’t remember…)

  15. cs gaerlan says:

    "Double faulted" really means the plane’s dumb–it commits two faults per crew that enters the cockpit. Well, no, on second thought it means there was a tremor in the cockit due to two faults–aren’t quakes caused at times by faults? It’s everybody’s fault, really.

  16. Drak says:

    I was on a plane scheduled to fly from London Luton to Amsterdam, and the captain cam e on the intercom: ‘Welcome to flight ###. We will be departing for Paris in a few minutes’.

    Everyone was looking puzzled, at eachother, and the captain came back on: ‘Uhm, it seems I won’t get to see the Eiffel tower today, we’re going to Amsterdam instead’.

    Sighs of relief ensued :)

  17. Sven Groot says:

    "Anecdotally, it’s a truly amazing experience to go from being entirely surrounded by clouds and having no visibility whatsoever to suddenly dropping out of the bottom of the layer a few feet above your DH or MDA (minimum descent altitude, the rough equivalent for so-called non-precision approaches) to see the runway stretching out right in front of you."

    When I do this in Flight Simulator, I usually end up with the runway way to the left or right of me. :P In other words: precision ILS approaches, not my strong point. Especially in a small aircraft with strong crosswinds.

    Playing Flight Simulator X online can also lead to some very interesting ATC conversations. A funny one I had recently, while flying around Gatwick (UK):

    Aircraft A: "Tower, can you confirm my position. I don’t know where I am."

    Tower: "Aircraft A, Gatwick Tower, I don’t have you on my scope."

    Aircraft A: "Gatwick tower, I appear to be in Canada."

    Me: "Just fly east for a bit…"

  18. Hayden says:

    Got on to a local plane at Schipol Airport. We sit for a bit, then the pilot starts the engines. To the right, the blades go round jerkily for a bit, then the engine catches, and it runs. Left hand engine does the same routine, and just spits out smoke and coughs. After a few minutes trying, some greasmonkeys appear, lift covers off the engine, yank on a few things, tut, scratch heads,  then get down. We then get off the plane, and have to get on another one.

    Now, this plane just recently landed. So if the engine had started, we’d have been off, with an engine that was about to die. Nice thought.

  19. Sherrod Segraves says:

    @Hayden:

    I had something similar happen to me once. I was in a small plane flying from Texarkana, Texas to Dallas when the cabin filled with a light haze of smoke, and something that looked like maple syrup was leaking out of the left engine.

    I was sitting in the front row of passenger seats, so I got a good view.

    The pilot was young, and she looked like she might be new. The first thing she did was pick up the intercom and announce "There’s no need to panic!" Then she opened up and read through a glossy manual for a few minutes. After that, she shut down the left engine. Thankfully, we returned to Texarkana without any more problems.

  20. Ry Jones says:

    the "glossy manual" she used is a checklist. That she said "don’t panic" and used the checklist shows her professionalism.

  21. Igor says:

    One of double fault cases is when both the aileron and elevator are stuck at different deflections.

  22. Harvey Pengwyn says:

    There was a story that the head of [insert large plane maker here] said he would only fly in 4 engined planes.

    Why, he would be asked.

    ‘Because there are no 5 engined planes’.

  23. I was on the tarmac in an Airbus when we taxied back to the terminal.  Turns out one of the two computers had an error, and though there was a redundant computer, they wouldn’t start out with one already crashed.

    Enter the tech, and they had to reboot the computer.  Turns out the only way to reboot it was to cycle the power… for the entire jet.  Which they did many times, each time the lights and air conditioning cutting out.  Now I know why flying with only one would not be an option.

  24. H. Eckler says:

    Better than hearing

    Maintenance crew in cockpit. They just told the pilot that the airplane "blue screened."

    Sorry, RC, I couldn’t resist.

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index