The three things you need to know about tsunamis

Date:May 30, 2007 / year-entry #193
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20070530-01/?p=26633
Comments:    9
Summary:One of my friends is involved with Science on Tap, a free, informal monthly get-together in the Seattle area covering science topics for the general public. (Recent coverage in the Seattle-PI.) The topic for July 30th is "The three things you need to know about tsunamis", and a title like that pretty much sells itself.

One of my friends is involved with Science on Tap, a free, informal monthly get-together in the Seattle area covering science topics for the general public. (Recent coverage in the Seattle-PI.) The topic for July 30th is "The three things you need to know about tsunamis", and a title like that pretty much sells itself.


Comments (9)
  1. Noodle says:

    1) They’re tsunamis

    2) They’re tsunamis

    and

    3) Did I mention they’re tsunamis?

    Anything else is just noise. :)

  2. Leo Petr says:

    One datum of noise is the argument over whether the correct plural is tsunami (as in Japanese) or tsunamis (as in conventional English).:)

  3. gkdada says:

    nonsense. tsunami IS plural. The singular for tsunami is tsunamus. However, it is never used since there is no SINGLE wave. They always come in one or more ‘files’, with each wave within a single file stretching a small distance, typically 50 – 100ft. Basic physics stuff, kids!

  4. Anon says:

    "However, it is never used since there is no SINGLE wave"

    What about solitons?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

    Incidentally, I heard in Thai tsunami a bunch of people were saved because someone worked out from the sea rapidly receding that a tsunami was about to hit.

  5. Leif Arne Storset says:

    <i>nonsense. tsunami IS plural. The singular for tsunami is tsunamus.</i>

    Er…tsunami is Japanese, not Latin. Tsunami in Japanese is both singular and plural. How we use it in English is another matter. I’ve seen both usages (pl. tsunami and pl. tsunamis), and I would be reluctant to denounce either.

  6. God says:

    The tsunami was an adumbration of the wrath of God, a harbinger of things to come: that Great Day of Judgment. Amos 3:6 "Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?"

    http://www.godhatesamerica.com/ghfmir/main/faq.html#tsunami

  7. gkdada says:

    Are the geeks visiting here so humorless as to take my tongue-in-cheek comment seriously?

    Actually I dropped the second part where I was going to say:

    ‘Japanese named tsunami so because they wished that these waves hit – quote – those d*#$ed chinese (from the land of sun <u>TZU</u>) and Vietnamese (from <u>’NAM</u>) instead’

  8. Leif Arne Storset says:

    Well, this geek is too used to seeing overapplication of Latin. In retrospect your joke was actually pretty funny. :)

    Hint: use smileys on the Internet to convey that your tongue is in your cheek. I can’t really see it from here. :)

  9. Anon says:

    "Are the geeks visiting here so humorless as to take my tongue-in-cheek comment seriously?"

    Yes. If you want humour to be supported, you need to rebuild with CFG_SUP_HUMOUR and CFG_NO_STRIP_HUMOR_SUPPORT defined. That should be OBVIOUS, even to YOU.

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index