Date: | March 6, 2007 / year-entry #82 |
Tags: | history |
Orig Link: | https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20070306-01/?p=27733 |
Comments: | 2 |
Summary: | Larry Osterman explains in a two-part series, The sad story of CoGetMalloc and Why was the ability to specify an allocator during CoInitialize removed from the system? |
Larry Osterman explains in a two-part series, The sad story of CoGetMalloc and Why was the ability to specify an allocator during CoInitialize removed from the system? |
Comments (2)
Comments are closed. |
I read through the corresponding chapter of Don Box’s "Essential COM" yesterday, and I was wondering "Why on earth did they put a ‘reserved’ parameter as the first parameter in there…?"
And now you know, and knowing is… 4/5ths the battle? Something like that?
And who said they were on Earth? ;)