I wouldn’t be surprised if O. J. Simpson wrote a new book

Date:February 23, 2007 / year-entry #68
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20070223-02/?p=27873
Comments:    9
Summary:You know, it's gotten to the point where I wouldn't be surprised if O. J. Simpson wrote a new book titled If I Were the Father of Anna Nicole Smith's Baby. Just saying.

You know, it's gotten to the point where I wouldn't be surprised if O. J. Simpson wrote a new book titled If I Were the Father of Anna Nicole Smith's Baby.

Just saying.


Comments (9)
  1. Nish says:

    If he did that, he’d be featured on Oprah for sure.

  2. Cooney says:

    Actually, K-fed’s the father.

  3. old_creepy_guy says:

    No, K-fed is not the father, neither is O.J.  

    I Am!!!  :-)

    Seriously, Raymond, this whole "I am the father" thing is really getting out of hand.  Why can’t she just be allowed to R.I.P?

  4. Vorn says:

    No, no.

    It’s Darth Vader.

    Get it right.

    Vorn

  5. Sean W. says:

    That’d never make headlines in the tabloids.  If you want them to notice it, include the words "Elvis," or "Bigfoot," or "alien," possibly like this:  "If Elvis was the father of Anna Nicole Smith’s alien baby, this is how he would’ve done it.  Photos on pp. 5-193."  Now *there’s* a headline we can all be proud of :-D

  6. The competition says:

    A new book with an old story?  What kind of thing would that be?

  7. David Pritchard says:

    You failed to apply O.J. grammar: it should be "If I am the father" or "If I was the father".

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index