Betsy’s interview tip: Wear pants

Date:March 10, 2006 / year-entry #90
Orig Link:
Comments:    10
Summary:Last year, our retiring Blog Queen Betsy Aoki reminded us to wear pants.

Comments (10)
  1. Moi says:

    That comment doesn’t matter for the British, because unlike Superman we don’t wear pants on the outside.

  2. Vorn says:

    The formatting on your trackback post over there makes it look like poetry, or maybe something from A Softer World.

  3. :: Wendy :: says:

    I’m confused.  Betsy thinks we should wear pants because otherwise we might forget if we wore pants or a skirt?  Odd reasoning.  

    Or is there some more practicable reason for wearing pants during a microsoft interview,  like blowy-airvents in the floor creating uncomfortable drafts?

    Or are you more likely to ge tthe job because you look like you fit in because virtually no microsofties non-pants?  

    Historically I’ve been accused of overanalysing things,  what do you think?

  4. Jorge Coelho says:

    If you don’t wear pants, you’re female, your interviewer is male and your legs are really nice… well, his attention won’t be on what you say to him, but on your legs. And if your interviewer is female, she will be comparing herself to you.

    Blame it on human nature, not me. :-)

  5. Lascaille says:

    </blockquote>And if your interviewer is female, she will be comparing herself to you.</blockquote>

    Oho. Nice reasoning there!

  6. Meh says:

    I wear girls underwear when in interviews (im the interviewer)

  7. :: Wendy :: says:

    Looks like Jorg’s company would have a tendancy to make poor recruitment decisions merely because interviewers "attention won’t be on what you say to him, but on your legs" thereby being unable to actually appropriately assess the candidates skills relevant to the job.

    How about – when interviewing a company to recruit you,  wear sexy clothes and if they can still assess your intellectual skills and ability relevant to the job then they are worth consdering as an employer.

  8. Jorge Coelho says:

    Good reasoning, Wendy! :-)

    Anyway, I hope you realized I was joking, although there is some truth to what I said. Men will be men (and women, women) and there is nothing wrong with that. Women are perfectly conscious of the impact sexy clothes have on men – and if she tells you otherwise, she’s lying. :)

    Meh, you cracked me up! hehe

  9. :: Wendy :: says:

    I dont assume men are heterosexual so I cannot know what impact the subjectively sexy clothing is hbaving on them.  And I’m not lying.

  10. Jorge Coelho says:

    No, but now you are over-analyzing things. ;-)

Comments are closed.

*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index