The not-entirely-unwitting victims of the Daily Show interview

Date:December 8, 2005 / year-entry #379
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20051208-12/?p=33033
Comments:    7
Summary:NPR's On the Media covers the world of the fake news interview, the leading example of which in the United States is The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Despite what you may think, the people interviewed by the likes of Ed Helms and Samantha Bee actually know that they're being interviewed by a fake news...

NPR's On the Media covers the world of the fake news interview, the leading example of which in the United States is The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Despite what you may think, the people interviewed by the likes of Ed Helms and Samantha Bee actually know that they're being interviewed by a fake news show and go along with it anyway.

But that doesn't mean that they know what's coming.

In a related story, MSNBC looks at what happens to some of those interviewees after the episode airs.

[Typos corrected 9:30am]


Comments (7)
  1. Jack Mathews says:

    It’s "Jon," not "John."

  2. Timo Frenay says:

    Also it’s "Samantha", not "Samatha".

  3. Charlie Williams says:

    Wow, he just can’t catch a break.

    Raymond, I’d like to point out all the words you did spell right. Bravo!

  4. cypherpunks says:

    Have you seen "The Ed Helms Report: College Recruiting Edition?" It’s hillarious! He tries to argue that MS is evil, interviewing people who on Microsoft’s campus who work there, and comes up with nothing.

    Classic moments:

    Ed says he first turned to his anonymous sources for information. Just after that, you see him going to Google and searching for "Microsoft evil" or something like that. ;)

    "You called it… the X-BOX?!?!?! …. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

    Ed goes around and steals a bunch of free drinks and junk food.

    Any chance that video will find its way onto Microsoft’s site? ;)

  5. Rufus Sarsaparilla says:

    Excellent articles — thanks for the links. I love the Daily Show, and that piece by Samantha Bee on bullying was brilliant.

  6. saraford says:

    We were cracking up at the "Rick James" segment from Hattiesburg, MS when it aired a few months ago. I’m not surprised he didn’t win the election. I figured not many (voting) people in the area watched the daily show.

    In my opinion, the funniest segment ever was Stephen Colbert’s "Storm Tracker Tracker.

  7. Robert Konigsberg says:

    A good friend of mine was interviewed by a Daily Show reporter. Friend asked what he was supposed to do — try to be funny? Reporter said, ‘just play it straight’, and the reporter did his schtick while my buddy played the straight man.

    Same friend was interviewed by a newspaper. Article was about being interviewed on the Daily Show. Another thing Friend said, which came from said article: the Daily Show doesn’t look to make idiots out of people they interview, so if someone comes off like a complete dolt, it might not be because of the Daily Show.

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index