For all your chicken sequencing needs

Date:December 10, 2004 / year-entry #417
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20041210-00/?p=37053
Comments:    11
Summary:The International Chicken Sequencing Consortium announced that it has completed the sequencing of chicken DNA. I repeat: There is an organization called "The International Chicken Sequencing Consortium". (For some reason I want to think these people get together and decide, "Okay, Ginger goes first, then Bunty, then Babs...")

The International Chicken Sequencing Consortium announced that it has completed the sequencing of chicken DNA.

I repeat: There is an organization called "The International Chicken Sequencing Consortium".

(For some reason I want to think these people get together and decide, "Okay, Ginger goes first, then Bunty, then Babs...")


Comments (11)
  1. Jay Lauffer says:

    That’s rich. Does this mean they’ll begin the sequencing of Schoolyard Bully DNA?

    Thanks for the Drag and Drop articles too.

  2. Mike says:

    That’s too funny. The first thing I thought when I saw the title of this entry was that someone had gotten together to solve the multithreaded chicken issue:

    http://pluralsight.com/blogs/mike/archive/2004/05/25/415.aspx

  3. Tom says:

    Mike, that multithreaded chicken joke is great.

  4. carlso says:

    The International Chicken Sequencing Consortium also announced that their recent discoveries were the result from earlier efforts of putting all of their ducks in a row.

  5. Andy in Austin, TX says:

    I wonder if they were able to isolate the "tastes like" chromosome?

  6. Andy in Austin:

    They have already, sort of. Try a "Not Chicken(TM)" which is based on soy instead of chicken, but it tastes quite like chicken (if I remember correctly how chicken tastes like, that is :)). For example see the product "Original Soy Filets" on this page http://www.sanitarium.com.au/products/meals/soy-healthy.html

  7. Robert Morris says:

    I’ve actually heard it referred to (on Slashdot and several news articles) the International Chicken *Genome* Sequencing Consortium, which makes sense and unforunately is much less funny. :-)

    On the other hand, I’ve also heard it the way you mention it.

  8. grouse says:

    It’s not a real organization–just a collective name for the people who are authors on the paper. Since there are 175 of us that would be a pretty enormous author list (the full list is at the end of the paper).

  9. Vorn says:

    But I don’t want to sequence chickens! I want to sequence ducks! Once I get all my ducks in a row I can…

    Vorn

  10. dmlee says:

    And how would you respond to the IERS (International Earth Rotation Service) ?

  11. Vorn says:

    Everybody needs a new Earth once in a while. :)

    Vorn

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index