What did the letters “NT” originally stand for?

Date:December 1, 2003 / year-entry #146
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20031201-00/?p=41663
Comments:    4
Summary:Finally, the real story of what the letters "N" and "T" originally stood for is now public, so I can stop being coy about it. (Via LockerGnome.)

Finally, the real story of what the letters "N" and "T" originally stood for is now public, so I can stop being coy about it. (Via LockerGnome.)

Comments (4)
  1. TRS-80 says:

    Note the date on the article: January 24, 2003

  2. Anonymous says:

    Please, we all know HAL -> IBM and WNT -> VMS is the real reason.

  3. Raymond Chen says:

    That’s right, and Windows Update is a government conspiracy. Look: Windows Update = WUP; shift it left two letters and you get USN = United States Navy.

    And open source software is secretly trying to deny your right to drive your car alone: GNU + 1 = HOV.

    Oh, and did I mention: The Longhorn Client is really a plot by the KGB. LHC – 1 = KGB.

  4. Mike Dimmick says:

    Would you prefer Mark Lucovsky’s presentation to the 4th USENIX Windows Systems Symposium in August 2000?

    See http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix-win2000/invitedtalks/lucovsky.ppt, where Lucovsky discusses the history of Windows NT before noting how the process for Windows 2000 nearly broke down completely…

Comments are closed.

*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index