Don’t let Marketing mess with your slides

Date:October 17, 2003 / year-entry #100
Tags:history
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20031017-00/?p=42123
Comments:    5
Summary:It's PDC season, so I thought I'd relate an anecdote about a conference from many years ago. I forget which conference it was, maybe GCDC 1996, we were all busy preparing our presentations and submitted them to the Microsoft conference representatives so they could apply the standard template, clean them up, print out copies to...

It's PDC season, so I thought I'd relate an anecdote about a conference from many years ago.

I forget which conference it was, maybe GCDC 1996, we were all busy preparing our presentations and submitted them to the Microsoft conference representatives so they could apply the standard template, clean them up, print out copies to go into the handouts, all that stuff.

What about that "clean them up" step?

We didn't realize what "clean them up" meant until we showed up at the conference and looked at the handouts.

Part of "cleaning up" was inserting "®" and "™" symbols as necessary. Which meant that they also took every occurrence of the abbreviation "VB" and changed it to "Microsoft Visual Basic®". They even did this to the presentation on vertex buffers. The abbreviation for vertex buffers is also "VB".

You can imagine what this did to the presentation on vertex buffers.


Comments (5)
  1. Pete Vidler says:

    So are you saying that Marketing couldn’t work out that the topic wasn’t actually visual basic? Or that they used an automated process without checking it? Either way that’s pretty dumb (just the sort of thing I’d probably do :) ).

  2. Peter Torr says:

    More subtle problems make you look stupid, too — like when you have a slide deck with some source code on it in a language that is case sensitive (eg, JScript) and they’ve helpfully "corrected" all occurences of ‘function’ with ‘Function’. Or when they use the "Smart Quotes" in Office to make the code impossible to copy-and-paste into VS.

    Oh and they also break your custom animation slides. And you can’t see the text on the bottom-right corner of the slide because of that annoying logo they just HAD to put there.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Reminds me of that recent Microsoft advert in some magazine or other (DDJ??) where there are typos in the code (webServce instead of webService or something). Someone at MS has gone to lots of trouble to develop intellisense ….

    I did mean to mention it on the feedback site or something but I doubt anyone ever reads it.

  4. Treekiller says:

    In the documentation I write I manually go back and correct any smart quotes that appear in code fragments specifically because many (most?) users just cut&paste them straight into their own programs. Since the API is multilingual, I have to be very careful to get the formatting just right for each language (e.g. use of VB line-continuation characters, etc etc).

  5. A few years ago,

    I told a story of how Marketing messed up a bunch of PDC slides
    by "helpfully" expanding…

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index