That $9 you got from the PayPal settlement? Taxable income.

Date:February 23, 2006 / year-entry #70
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20060223-21/?p=32163
Comments:    12
Summary:If you're like many people, you signed up for the PayPal class action lawsuit and got around $9 for filing a claim against the Statutory Damage Fund. My read of IRS publication 4345 says that this constitutes taxable income. Note: This is just my personal opinion. Consult with your tax advisor before taking action. As...

If you're like many people, you signed up for the PayPal class action lawsuit and got around $9 for filing a claim against the Statutory Damage Fund. My read of IRS publication 4345 says that this constitutes taxable income. Note: This is just my personal opinion. Consult with your tax advisor before taking action. As for me, I reported it. Given my previous experience with the IRS, I'm willing to fork over the $3 to avoid getting audited.


Comments (12)
  1. Garry Trinder says:

    Are you sure that getting your blog published here for free is not taxable ? ;-)

  2. Jay B says:

    If only we could move to a FairTax like system…

  3. bkaras4 says:

    Please don’t debate FairTax here!  I like reading unsullied comments.

  4. Jon says:

    I believe income under $10 is not required to be reported. (It’s definitely true for interest and dividends)

  5. denis bider says:

    Would I just need to be selling some software for $9 per license then, and all that income would be untaxable? :)

  6. Jerry Pisk says:

    I didn’t know there was a personal injury suit against Paypal, I think you’re basing your opinion on a publication that is not applicable to your case.

    At the same time I would agree that unless the money is for overcharging you it will be considered taxable income.

  7. Phyllis says:

    Jon:  I believe that your bank or broker doesn’t report income under $10 via a statement to you or the IRS, but you’re still supposed to claim it on your taxes.

  8. Andy says:

    It’s a refund of your already taxed income for overpayment, not income.

    That would be saying that if I bought a pair of shoes for $100, realized they charged me $120 and then got a refund of $20 that it would be income. It is not.

  9. According to my read of form 4345, compensatory damages are not taxed, but punitive damages are.

  10. pcooper says:

    You have to report *all* income.

    One of my favorite IRS quotes:

    "Illegal income. Illegal income, such as money from dealing illegal drugs, must be included in your income on Form 1040, line 21, or on Schedule C or Schedule C-EZ (Form 1040) if from your self-employment activity." — IRS Publication 17, Your Federal Income Tax <http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch12.html#d0e32305&gt;

    Bribes and Stolen Property must also be reported.

  11. silkio says:

    pcooper said:

    "One of my favorite IRS quotes: "

    You might find that’s in there as a tool to use on criminals, not as any real expectation of them really reporting it.

    If they discover such income on a drug dealer or theif, they can prosecute them under tax law as well as criminal.

  12. I just want to know one thing:

    How much did the lawyers involved in the settlement get taxed after they got paid?

    James

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index