Calculate the speed of light by microwaving marshmallows

Date:June 9, 2004 / year-entry #227
Tags:non-computer
Orig Link:https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040609-00/?p=38953
Comments:    4
Summary:A simple experiment, and you can eat the results! Via The Annals of Improbable Research.

A simple experiment, and you can eat the results!

Via The Annals of Improbable Research.


Comments (4)
  1. Ben Hutchings says:

    I’ve seen this demonstrated on TV, only with cheese instead of marshamllows. I can’t help thinking that it’s cheating to rely on the microwave specifications though.

  2. Daniel says:

    Well, yes, but at least the experiment demonstrates that the speed of electromagnetic waves, the speed of light (which is electromagnetic waves), the wavelength and the frequency are all linked together.

    I like those unconventional ways to make science more interesting.

    I remember watching the Australian-originated "Curiosity Show" when I was a child.

  3. terry says:

    I recently came across a similar experiment but using colour changing silly putty:

    http://www.puttyworld.com/usethputofis.html

Comments are closed.


*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT OWN THIS CONTENT. If you are the owner and would like it removed, please contact me. The content herein is an archived reproduction of entries from Raymond Chen's "Old New Thing" Blog (most recent link is here). It may have slight formatting modifications for consistency and to improve readability.

WHY DID I DUPLICATE THIS CONTENT HERE? Let me first say this site has never had anything to sell and has never shown ads of any kind. I have nothing monetarily to gain by duplicating content here. Because I had made my own local copy of this content throughout the years, for ease of using tools like grep, I decided to put it online after I discovered some of the original content previously and publicly available, had disappeared approximately early to mid 2019. At the same time, I present the content in an easily accessible theme-agnostic way.

The information provided by Raymond's blog is, for all practical purposes, more authoritative on Windows Development than Microsoft's own MSDN documentation and should be considered supplemental reading to that documentation. The wealth of missing details provided by this blog that Microsoft could not or did not document about Windows over the years is vital enough, many would agree an online "backup" of these details is a necessary endeavor. Specifics include:

<-- Back to Old New Thing Archive Index